Botanical gardens: living collections need place, phenology and care history
A practical data model for plants that move, develop, flower, decline and receive care over time.
Connect fields and beds with crop history, mixtures, phenology, water, nitrogen, work, inventory and economics—at the scale you actually manage.

Fields, rotations, operations, nutrients and economics.

Twelve beds, mixtures, successions, water, work and forest-garden layers.

Glasshouses, living collections, accession context, phenology and care.

Four beds, plantings, watering and next-season memory.
Every screen below is an approved excerpt from the product, matched to this workflow and retained with its original-file record.

Current conditions and forecast remain beside the farm decisions they may change.

The map gives every observation and plan a stable spatial reference.

Fields, crops, areas and expected consequences form one explicit seasonal plan.

Growth, yield and nitrogen remain separate, question-ready results.

Alternatives are compared across agronomic and economic consequences, not one hidden score.
Fields, plots, beds and collections keep stable identities.
→02Records, sensing, samples and phenology remain located and dated.
→03Planning and models compare rotations, mixtures, water, yield and nitrogen.
→04Work, nutrients, inventory, documentation, economics and interfaces carry the choice forward.
→The farmers version is available in Austria exclusively through Maschinenring Niederösterreich-Wien and Maschinenring Steiermark. Maschinenring is a customer and the Austrian distribution route for this version.
A practical data model for plants that move, develop, flower, decline and receive care over time.
How spatial layers, perennial plants, phenology and care history can be kept in one inspectable system.
Why diverse growing systems need records for species, density, arrangement, timing and labour—not one crop name per bed.
It connects places, plants, crop plans, observations, work, water, nutrients, models and costs in one growing record. Start with one useful part; add depth without entering the same facts again.
No. It is designed for farms, market gardens, permaculture systems, botanical gardens and home growers. Each can use a workflow suited to its scale and diversity.
It includes field and work records, but goes further: growing plots, successions, mixed crops, biological models, scenarios and whole-system consequences use the same connected foundation.
No. It organises evidence, runs transparent calculations and compares realistic options. The decision and responsibility stay with the people who know the farm.
Begin with places, plants, a seasonal plan or one workflow that currently breaks apart. Existing users can open the external system; new growers and organisations can send us the concrete problem.
Send the place, data, decision and consequence that must remain connected.